Why does Congress want to take away easy access to birth control for poor women? - deficit reduction act long term care
Although most Americans believe that birth control should be easily accessible, the cost of the birth control shot is heaven. Why? High costs are the result of an obscure provision of the Act to the 2005 deficit, which has a long tradition back incentives to encourage the pharmaceutical industry, the birth control abruptly cut rebates for certain costs among service providers for the healthcare industry. The Act entered into force in January 2007 forced the health of the entire country to raise their prices. Some costs incurred by the temporary storage of drugs before the law came into force, but the reserves are quickly exhausted.
In all the years he was in office, Bush has tried to funds under Title X, which pays the basic costs of operating more than 4,500 family planning clinics, which in turn block millions of low-income women. In fact, taking into account inflation, Title X funds is now 61 percent less than in 1980.
How to help the birth control for poor women to control our society?
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Deficit Reduction Act Long Term Care Why Does Congress Want To Take Away Easy Access To Birth Control For Poor Women?
3 comments:
Christian agenda. Have you noticed how ads can not promote the benefits of condoms to birth control, but only the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Or have you noticed how many commercials do not mention birth control pill to control the benefits of birth, but only for their impact on the period, mood, and acne.
It is a program out there to stop all forms of contraception, please listen, right-wing politicians who are closer to live, not just talk about getting rid of abortion, but there are signs to get rid of it, as well as all contraceptives.
I do not know why we do this. In fact I would even say that we encourage poor women, must be made to the control of birth.
I havent pursue a grant for research on the subject will, I would like, but I think it should, however, provide an incentive for women given ****** somehow be verifiable control. It would be cheaper than the loss of all education and free school meals for a man who probably end up doing more ignorant and poor children.
I think we have too many people on this planet, as it is without a doubt the stupidest not need.
settled in Sweden
Still better there
Post a Comment